The Barbell and the Option
These two cards are about how a coach spends practice time and takes risks. The barbell puts most of practice into the floor, the habits that hold under pressure, and gives a small, time-boxed slice to a swing with real upside.
It avoids the builds neither. The option is how the swing gets chosen: run many small, cheap experiments, keep your name off them, and let the few surprises pay for the rest. Together they make a loop, where the option finds it and the barbell keeps it.
One rule holds across both: no experiment ever costs a player something real.
These two cards are about how a coach spends practice time and takes risks. The barbell puts most of practice into the floor, the habits that hold under pressure, and gives a small, time-boxed slice to a swing with real upside.
It avoids the builds neither. The option is how the swing gets chosen: run many small, cheap experiments, keep your name off them, and let the few surprises pay for the rest. Together they make a loop, where the option finds it and the barbell keeps it.
One rule holds across both: no experiment ever costs a player something real.
0
0
3
347
These two cards come from the same idea: players are built through repetition, and much of what gets repeated in a gym never makes it on the practice plan.
“From the Inside” is the player’s side. It gives them two tools they can own: a chest tap to reset after a mistake and a o rehearse the next moment before it arrives. “What We Install” is our side.
It asks us to look at what we repeat without meaning to: the sentences from the bench, the things we say in the hottest moments, the identity we hand a player one comment at a time. Read together, one card is about what the player practises, and the other is about what we practise on them. Both work the same way, slowly, through reps, and both are worth doing on purpose.
“From the Inside” is the player’s side. It gives them two tools they can own: a chest tap to reset after a mistake and a o rehearse the next moment before it arrives. “What We Install” is our side.
It asks us to look at what we repeat without meaning to: the sentences from the bench, the things we say in the hottest moments, the identity we hand a player one comment at a time. Read together, one card is about what the player practises, and the other is about what we practise on them. Both work the same way, slowly, through reps, and both are worth doing on purpose.
0
1
7
974
The “Two Roads to Good”
1. Make one more: same shots, one more drops. 9 of 25 = 1.08.
2. Take three fewer: same makes, three Bronze misses passed up. 8 of 22 = 1.09.
The passed-up shot only pays if the possession finds something better.
1. Make one more: same shots, one more drops. 9 of 25 = 1.08.
2. Take three fewer: same makes, three Bronze misses passed up. 8 of 22 = 1.09.
The passed-up shot only pays if the possession finds something better.
0
0
11
653
Every Touch Has a Job
A simple phrase for a hard idea.
Most of what goes wrong in a possession doesn't look wrong. The ball moves, players stay busy, and nothing happens. The shot goes up, and everyone watches it. The catch gets held while the player decides. The dribble round the outside and asks nobody anything.
The catch. The read is made before the ball arrives, and the catch is only the doing. Shoot, drive or move it in half a second. (Off the Catch)
None of those are mistakes you'd stop practice for. They're touches without a purpose, and a team can have dozens of them in a game without anyone noticing. So we've started giving each touch a job.
Four touches, four jobs
The dribble. Attack space, dribble at a teammate to send them on a back cut, or draw the second defender. Dribbling without a purpose isn't a job. (Give the Dribble a Job)
The pass. Punish the help, shift the defence, hit the cutter, set up the shot. A pass that moves nobody isn't a job either. (Give the Pass a Job)
The miss. Tag up on every shot taken. Everybody, including the shooter: stay off the baseline and on the high shoulder of the defender blocking you out. If it goes the other way, the tag tells you who you're guarding. (Give the Miss a Job)
One question checks the catch, the dribble and the pass: did a defender have to move? If the answer is no, the touch didn't do its job. The miss has its own check: did everybody tag up on every shot?
You can ask the same thing of cuts and screens: does this create room for someone to attack? Spacing isn't the distance between teammates. It's the room a touch, a cut or a screen makes. So the job list never needs to be complete. Teach players what they're trying to create (space, a closeout, a matchup, one defender guarding two offensive players), and they'll find jobs we never wrote down.
Why something this simple works
"Give it a job" sounds almost too plain to be coaching. That's the point. It isn't the whole idea; it's the handle. The depth lives underneath, in the reads and the lists of jobs. The phrase is the part a player can grab at full speed.
It's short enough to say in a timeout. It turns into a question a player can ask on their own mid-possession: what's this dribble's job? And it travels. Players learn the frame once, and every new action plugs into it.
The test of a coaching phrase isn't whether it sounds clever. It's whether a tired player can still use it with the defence coming.
In the gym
Pick one touch at a time. In practice games, a touch with no job counts as a turnover. Score the jobs, not just the baskets. Freeze the play and ask, "What was that pass for?" If the player can't answer, it didn't have a job.
Then, once the habit shows up on its own, take the rule away and let the game keep it.
Every touch has a job.
A simple phrase for a hard idea.
Most of what goes wrong in a possession doesn't look wrong. The ball moves, players stay busy, and nothing happens. The shot goes up, and everyone watches it. The catch gets held while the player decides. The dribble round the outside and asks nobody anything.
The catch. The read is made before the ball arrives, and the catch is only the doing. Shoot, drive or move it in half a second. (Off the Catch)
None of those are mistakes you'd stop practice for. They're touches without a purpose, and a team can have dozens of them in a game without anyone noticing. So we've started giving each touch a job.
Four touches, four jobs
The dribble. Attack space, dribble at a teammate to send them on a back cut, or draw the second defender. Dribbling without a purpose isn't a job. (Give the Dribble a Job)
The pass. Punish the help, shift the defence, hit the cutter, set up the shot. A pass that moves nobody isn't a job either. (Give the Pass a Job)
The miss. Tag up on every shot taken. Everybody, including the shooter: stay off the baseline and on the high shoulder of the defender blocking you out. If it goes the other way, the tag tells you who you're guarding. (Give the Miss a Job)
One question checks the catch, the dribble and the pass: did a defender have to move? If the answer is no, the touch didn't do its job. The miss has its own check: did everybody tag up on every shot?
You can ask the same thing of cuts and screens: does this create room for someone to attack? Spacing isn't the distance between teammates. It's the room a touch, a cut or a screen makes. So the job list never needs to be complete. Teach players what they're trying to create (space, a closeout, a matchup, one defender guarding two offensive players), and they'll find jobs we never wrote down.
Why something this simple works
"Give it a job" sounds almost too plain to be coaching. That's the point. It isn't the whole idea; it's the handle. The depth lives underneath, in the reads and the lists of jobs. The phrase is the part a player can grab at full speed.
It's short enough to say in a timeout. It turns into a question a player can ask on their own mid-possession: what's this dribble's job? And it travels. Players learn the frame once, and every new action plugs into it.
The test of a coaching phrase isn't whether it sounds clever. It's whether a tired player can still use it with the defence coming.
In the gym
Pick one touch at a time. In practice games, a touch with no job counts as a turnover. Score the jobs, not just the baskets. Freeze the play and ask, "What was that pass for?" If the player can't answer, it didn't have a job.
Then, once the habit shows up on its own, take the rule away and let the game keep it.
Every touch has a job.
0
2
28
1,527
A game is a set of rules we agree to. Basketball is itself a constraint: you can’t run with the ball, and you can’t kick it, and every great move in the game was invented inside those rules.
These three cards look at constraints from three angles. Card 1 is the toolkit: what a rs a coach can pull, and how to design one by changing one thing, saying nothing, and taking it away.
Card 4 asks the season question: what’s the one thing that, if we open it up, will help us improve everywhere? Not all constraints exert equal force, so find the bottleneck by counting, not guessing.
Card 5 is about the constraints we often overlook, the team rules that never come off. They don’t limit five-player creativity. They make it possible. Some constraints you take away. Some you keep forever. The ones you keep are what make five players one team.
These three cards look at constraints from three angles. Card 1 is the toolkit: what a rs a coach can pull, and how to design one by changing one thing, saying nothing, and taking it away.
Card 4 asks the season question: what’s the one thing that, if we open it up, will help us improve everywhere? Not all constraints exert equal force, so find the bottleneck by counting, not guessing.
Card 5 is about the constraints we often overlook, the team rules that never come off. They don’t limit five-player creativity. They make it possible. Some constraints you take away. Some you keep forever. The ones you keep are what make five players one team.
0
3
43
2,597
Every player has a default: the thing they do when nothing stops them. A good constraint blocks that path of least resistance and forces a new solution. That’s the coaching skill these two cards are about: choosing the one constraint that blocks the habit you want to break, then game alone.
Card 1 offers three ideas: habits are patterns players settle into, constraints come in more than one kind, and the scoreboard can teach as well as the rules.
Card 2 is a menu of seven half-court habits, each with one constraint and the new solution it should bring out. Pick one, run it until the new solution shows up, then take it away and give the game back. A good constraint doesn’t tell players what to do. It takes away what they always do.
Card 1 offers three ideas: habits are patterns players settle into, constraints come in more than one kind, and the scoreboard can teach as well as the rules.
Card 2 is a menu of seven half-court habits, each with one constraint and the new solution it should bring out. Pick one, run it until the new solution shows up, then take it away and give the game back. A good constraint doesn’t tell players what to do. It takes away what they always do.
0
2
31
1,602
“See the Floor” is one of the most common things shouted from a bench, and one of the least useful. These two cards break it into things a player can actually find. Before the drive: who can help, and where will the help come from? On the drive: see chest in front, get to two the help came from. Card 1 teaches the read 3v3, where the help-side shape is small enough to hold. Card 2 scales it to 5v5: the square breaks, the cutter ghost cuts, and the open player is wherever the last helper left. Run them in order, name one target per rep, and freeze the play one step before the help arrives. Players see what we teach them to look for.
1
5
125
7,205
Tim Brady retweeted
🏀 Basketball Manitoba is accepting coach applications for the 2027 Provincial Team Program!
Applications are open for coaching positions with the 17U, 15U and 14U male and female teams. Coaches can apply individually or as a group. The program offers a chance to support athle…
Applications are open for coaching positions with the 17U, 15U and 14U male and female teams. Coaches can apply individually or as a group. The program offers a chance to support athle…
0
1
0
136
Most players won’t play professionally, and that was never the point. Basketball is the training ground, not the destination.
Hours in the gym quietly teach you to take feedback without falling apart, perform when things are uncomfortable, read a situation quickly, and win and ther define you. Players also learn to keep going when progress is slow, to be useful inside something that isn’t about them, and to belong to something bigger than themselves.
None of it shows up in the box score, but all of it shows up for the next sixty years. Those skills only grow if the player stays in the game long enough for them to take hold, and that’s why the adults matter so much. Our job is to teach the game well and to make sure they’re still in the gym next season.
Hours in the gym quietly teach you to take feedback without falling apart, perform when things are uncomfortable, read a situation quickly, and win and ther define you. Players also learn to keep going when progress is slow, to be useful inside something that isn’t about them, and to belong to something bigger than themselves.
None of it shows up in the box score, but all of it shows up for the next sixty years. Those skills only grow if the player stays in the game long enough for them to take hold, and that’s why the adults matter so much. Our job is to teach the game well and to make sure they’re still in the gym next season.
0
11
42
2,799
The Lego Bridge Experiment
A group of researchers ran an experiment. They built a small Lego bridge with a flaw. One support block was placed off-center, making the whole structure unstable. They handed it to a series of subjects and gave them a simple instruction. Fix it. They could remove blocks. Whatever it took to make the bridge stable.
Almost every subject reached for more blocks.
They added supports underneath. They added bracing on the sides. They built up around the wobble. Almost nobody removed the one off-center block that caused the problem in the first place, even though removing it was the simplest, fastest, and most elegant fix. The subjects weren’t dumb. They weren’t lazy. They just didn’t see subtraction as an option. The bridge needed help, and help meant adding.
That instinct (reach for more, never less) is one of the most consistent patterns in how humans solve problems. We don’t reject subtraction. We literally don’t think of it. It’s a blind spot.
Now think about your playbook.
A group of researchers ran an experiment. They built a small Lego bridge with a flaw. One support block was placed off-center, making the whole structure unstable. They handed it to a series of subjects and gave them a simple instruction. Fix it. They could remove blocks. Whatever it took to make the bridge stable.
Almost every subject reached for more blocks.
They added supports underneath. They added bracing on the sides. They built up around the wobble. Almost nobody removed the one off-center block that caused the problem in the first place, even though removing it was the simplest, fastest, and most elegant fix. The subjects weren’t dumb. They weren’t lazy. They just didn’t see subtraction as an option. The bridge needed help, and help meant adding.
That instinct (reach for more, never less) is one of the most consistent patterns in how humans solve problems. We don’t reject subtraction. We literally don’t think of it. It’s a blind spot.
Now think about your playbook.
1
0
11
885