Chexxe retweeted
Two new Wuthering Waves Resonators, by update:
✸ Lily | Version 3.8 | Spectro Pistol support
✸ Anna | Version 4.0 | Fusion Broadblade DPS
Both served as medics in the Resonator War before taking different paths.
Lily drops tomorrow with 25% team damage amplification.
Anna follows in 4.0 to open the New Federation.
Astrite budgets are already under pressure.
✸ Lily | Version 3.8 | Spectro Pistol support
✸ Anna | Version 4.0 | Fusion Broadblade DPS
Both served as medics in the Resonator War before taking different paths.
Lily drops tomorrow with 25% team damage amplification.
Anna follows in 4.0 to open the New Federation.
Astrite budgets are already under pressure.
21
14
21
711
Chexxe retweeted
Đây là chi tiết bản kế hoạch có thể giúp tôi có thể kiếm được hơn 50tr/1tháng
- Bỏ 900k đi chích ngừa dại
- Xong đi chọc cho Cầy cắn , chủ Cầy đền 900
- 1 ngày cho 2 con cắn đc 1tr8
- 1 tháng được 54tr, trừ 900 còn 53tr100
Gần gấp 4 lần tiền lương đại g các ný ơi
- Bỏ 900k đi chích ngừa dại
- Xong đi chọc cho Cầy cắn , chủ Cầy đền 900
- 1 ngày cho 2 con cắn đc 1tr8
- 1 tháng được 54tr, trừ 900 còn 53tr100
Gần gấp 4 lần tiền lương đại g các ný ơi
Tất cả mọi người tại hiện trường đã phải ngạc nhiên đến đứng hình sau khi 2 chiếc xe máy va chạm với nhau thì chúng đã quấn lấy nhau quay vòng tròn mãi không chịu dừng
17
10
12
462
Chexxe retweeted
K-pop is taking over Disney's holiday stage.
aespa filmed at Magic Kingdom for ABC this week:
✸ Track | "Jingle Bell Rock"
✸ Setting | Town Square Theater steps
✸ Broadcast | ABC Holiday Spectacular, Nov 30
While the four-member group drew park crowds, fan footage quickly zeroed in on Karina.
Even surrounded by Disney spectacle, personal star power steals the show.
aespa filmed at Magic Kingdom for ABC this week:
✸ Track | "Jingle Bell Rock"
✸ Setting | Town Square Theater steps
✸ Broadcast | ABC Holiday Spectacular, Nov 30
While the four-member group drew park crowds, fan footage quickly zeroed in on Karina.
Even surrounded by Disney spectacle, personal star power steals the show.
23
26
73
2,504
Chexxe retweeted
ENHYPEN is the latest act to join the D ICON D FESTA photobook series.
Pre-orders opened today for the collection, featuring exclusive portraits and conceptual shots from the Seoul exhibition.
The stats:
240 pages
1,250 g
Multiple member-specific editions
Official pre-orders are live through November 22.
Is this the definitive record of their growth?
Pre-orders opened today for the collection, featuring exclusive portraits and conceptual shots from the Seoul exhibition.
The stats:
240 pages
1,250 g
Multiple member-specific editions
Official pre-orders are live through November 22.
Is this the definitive record of their growth?
12
13
19
1,212
Chexxe retweeted
A cryptographically valid proof can still be too old to act on.
Imagine a stablecoin dashboard showing $100 million in reserves, supported by a valid proof generated yesterday.
The proof might be completely genuine. But what if the institution has already transferred assets or tions since then?
That is why I think data freshness deserves more attention when discussing @primus_labs.
Primus's zkTLS technology addresses a fundamental problem: proving that financial information genuinely came from an authenticated source rather than a screenshot or an unverifiable claim.
In the Unitas Proof of Reserves architecture, a TEE protects sensitive information during processing, while Brevis's Pico zkVM proves that the published reserve figures were correctly calculated from authenticated inputs.
This creates a much stronger foundation for financial verification.
But there are three different things worth separating.
Data authenticity tells us where the information came from.
Computational correctness tells us whether the result was calculated properly.
Data freshness tells us whether that information is still relevant to the decision being made.
For financial applications, all three matter.
A system consuming cryptographic proofs should consider when the underlying data was retrieved, how frequently financial positions can change, and when an older proof should be refreshed or rejected.
This is especially important for institutions managing positions across centralized exchanges and blockchain networks.
What interests me about Primus is how its verification infrastructure opens the door to more reliable financial applications without requiring institutions to publish their private account information.
A trustworthy financial system needs more than valid proofs. It needs evidence that remains relevant when decisions are made.
Imagine a stablecoin dashboard showing $100 million in reserves, supported by a valid proof generated yesterday.
The proof might be completely genuine. But what if the institution has already transferred assets or tions since then?
That is why I think data freshness deserves more attention when discussing @primus_labs.
Primus's zkTLS technology addresses a fundamental problem: proving that financial information genuinely came from an authenticated source rather than a screenshot or an unverifiable claim.
In the Unitas Proof of Reserves architecture, a TEE protects sensitive information during processing, while Brevis's Pico zkVM proves that the published reserve figures were correctly calculated from authenticated inputs.
This creates a much stronger foundation for financial verification.
But there are three different things worth separating.
Data authenticity tells us where the information came from.
Computational correctness tells us whether the result was calculated properly.
Data freshness tells us whether that information is still relevant to the decision being made.
For financial applications, all three matter.
A system consuming cryptographic proofs should consider when the underlying data was retrieved, how frequently financial positions can change, and when an older proof should be refreshed or rejected.
This is especially important for institutions managing positions across centralized exchanges and blockchain networks.
What interests me about Primus is how its verification infrastructure opens the door to more reliable financial applications without requiring institutions to publish their private account information.
A trustworthy financial system needs more than valid proofs. It needs evidence that remains relevant when decisions are made.
163
11
161
2,364
Chexxe retweeted
Class today is about one letter in the middle of a wallet address. Address poisoning means a scammer sends you a tiny transfer from a lookalike address, hoping you copy it from history later
A student of mine nearly sent her rent there. Before big transfers she now posts the dy group and lets someone read it back from the official source
Homework: never copy from history, and bookmark this post for the next big send. That second pair of eyes is what #SocialMining and @TheDAOLabs run on, and why this #Web3 #HorrorStory belongs in the thread below
A student of mine nearly sent her rent there. Before big transfers she now posts the dy group and lets someone read it back from the official source
Homework: never copy from history, and bookmark this post for the next big send. That second pair of eyes is what #SocialMining and @TheDAOLabs run on, and why this #Web3 #HorrorStory belongs in the thread below
19
12
27
2,732
Chexxe retweeted
In Web3, consistency matters, but quality makes the difference. 💜
That's something I appreciate about the creator campaign from @VelixoMarket.
Instead of simply flooding the timeline with content, creators have an opportunity to stand out through original posts and meaningful building its creator ecosystem on Fogo and Robinhood Chain, bringing more attention to the connection between content, communities, and onchain opportunities.
My approach is simple:
Create something original.
Share real thoughts.
Keep building.
The best communities grow together. 🚀
Let's keep building with Velixo!
$VLX #Velixo #Fogo #Web3
That's something I appreciate about the creator campaign from @VelixoMarket.
Instead of simply flooding the timeline with content, creators have an opportunity to stand out through original posts and meaningful building its creator ecosystem on Fogo and Robinhood Chain, bringing more attention to the connection between content, communities, and onchain opportunities.
My approach is simple:
Create something original.
Share real thoughts.
Keep building.
The best communities grow together. 🚀
Let's keep building with Velixo!
$VLX #Velixo #Fogo #Web3
66
25
62
3,430
Chexxe retweeted
The phase difference between token and operation will make the model difficult to last
A token design can look very well-out technically: reasonable allocation, clear reward mechanism, detailed utility. However, if it does not match the way the business actually operates on a ill appear after the launch.
Users may not see a clear reason to hold or use tokens other than the price factor. The operation team must constantly adjust the mechanism to maintain participation. Actual value creation activities are not properly supported by tokens, leading to dependence on short-term incentives instead of sustainable value. These phase deviations usually do not appear on paper, but are only revealed when the model starts to run in reality.
Token architecture needs to be built on a clear understanding of how organizations create value, serve participants and manage operations. It cannot replace the clarification of the business model. On the contrary, it must support and reflect that model. When this coupling is still weak, even complex designs easily become a burden instead of an advantage.
That is the reason why token architecture must stand next to business development and marketing. Business development is commercially oriented. Token architecture realizes the appropriate mechanism. Marketing helps the model to be understood and accepted by those involved. No array can work effectively without coordination with the rest of the arrays.
@TheDAOLabs identifies these three areas as an important part of consulting services for tokenized businesses. Considering them at the same time helps reduce the risk of phase difference between the token and the actual operation.
A token is only durable when it properly serves the business behind it that is creating value and operating. Let's start from there, instead of trying to build a model around a pre-designed token.
#SocialMining
A token design can look very well-out technically: reasonable allocation, clear reward mechanism, detailed utility. However, if it does not match the way the business actually operates on a ill appear after the launch.
Users may not see a clear reason to hold or use tokens other than the price factor. The operation team must constantly adjust the mechanism to maintain participation. Actual value creation activities are not properly supported by tokens, leading to dependence on short-term incentives instead of sustainable value. These phase deviations usually do not appear on paper, but are only revealed when the model starts to run in reality.
Token architecture needs to be built on a clear understanding of how organizations create value, serve participants and manage operations. It cannot replace the clarification of the business model. On the contrary, it must support and reflect that model. When this coupling is still weak, even complex designs easily become a burden instead of an advantage.
That is the reason why token architecture must stand next to business development and marketing. Business development is commercially oriented. Token architecture realizes the appropriate mechanism. Marketing helps the model to be understood and accepted by those involved. No array can work effectively without coordination with the rest of the arrays.
@TheDAOLabs identifies these three areas as an important part of consulting services for tokenized businesses. Considering them at the same time helps reduce the risk of phase difference between the token and the actual operation.
A token is only durable when it properly serves the business behind it that is creating value and operating. Let's start from there, instead of trying to build a model around a pre-designed token.
#SocialMining
63
29
64
1,993
Chexxe retweeted
Quick question for anyone who has run a campaign: how many of those likes were still around a month later?
This new post calls that fading activity ghost metrics and argues real contribution is the kind other people can check. Research, explainers, consistently showing up. In #SocialMining, Rewards from @TheDAOLabs follow work that passes review, which feels like the right incentive
This new post calls that fading activity ghost metrics and argues real contribution is the kind other people can check. Research, explainers, consistently showing up. In #SocialMining, Rewards from @TheDAOLabs follow work that passes review, which feels like the right incentive
Follower counts and likes are still treated as the main sign of influence. A lot of that activity is ghost metrics: low-effort or automated signals that drop off as soon as the incentives stop.
Real contribution looks different. It shows up in original research, clear y participation that other people can actually look at and check. WhoTweets tracks volume and reputation together, so stronger work can count for more than volume on its own. Social Miners earn Rewards when the output holds up under review.
One can be bought. The other can be examined.
52
8
65
2,296
Chexxe retweeted
Marketers have known for years that vanity numbers make nice slides and weak decisions. A follower spike looks great in a report, but if it was automated or farmed, it tells you nothing about who will stay
What I like in this clip is the alternative @TheDAOLabs offers. Instead of counting the crowd, look at what people produced: research, guides, consistent participation that can be checked. WhoTweets combines reputation with volume, so quality has real weight in #SocialMining
For brands working in the #DAOVERSE, that is a far better signal to plan around
What I like in this clip is the alternative @TheDAOLabs offers. Instead of counting the crowd, look at what people produced: research, guides, consistent participation that can be checked. WhoTweets combines reputation with volume, so quality has real weight in #SocialMining
For brands working in the #DAOVERSE, that is a far better signal to plan around
Follower counts and likes are still treated as the main sign of influence. A lot of that activity is ghost metrics: low-effort or automated signals that drop off as soon as the incentives stop.
Real contribution looks different. It shows up in original research, clear y participation that other people can actually look at and check. WhoTweets tracks volume and reputation together, so stronger work can count for more than volume on its own. Social Miners earn Rewards when the output holds up under review.
One can be bought. The other can be examined.
47
7
56
1,029
Chexxe retweeted
Four Days Left In Season 1.
@rarelistio
I've been watching the Rarelist leaderboard all season, and the final days always tell the truth about a campaign.
The points stop mattering as much as the pattern. Who kept showing up when the pool was nearly counted.
Season 1 closes on 000 pool behind it. Eleven thousand creators shared one season, and the timeline felt different because of it.
What stays after the season ends is not the ranking. It's the habit of posting something worth reading.
That's the part I'm keeping.
Powered by @rarelistio
@rarelistio
I've been watching the Rarelist leaderboard all season, and the final days always tell the truth about a campaign.
The points stop mattering as much as the pattern. Who kept showing up when the pool was nearly counted.
Season 1 closes on 000 pool behind it. Eleven thousand creators shared one season, and the timeline felt different because of it.
What stays after the season ends is not the ranking. It's the habit of posting something worth reading.
That's the part I'm keeping.
Powered by @rarelistio
83
35
94
7,692
Chexxe retweeted
Turtle is not waiting for Q4 to prove the next product.
Turtle is a liquidity distribution protocol that connects protocols needing liquidity with LPs looking for steadier incentives, and @turtledotxyz sets out the detail in its Q3
Group revenue reached $1.04M in Q3, up from SR is a credit desk that launched on 7 October, and its first vaults are Hare USD Earn and Hare Gold Earn.
Both vaults are powered by Aave, and the gold vault works with Paxos.
A distribution layer that already earns revenue can carry a new credit product without asking LPs to trust a promise first.
Hare's first vaults open in Q4, and the test is whether the same distribution that worked in Q3 keeps working at a larger scale.
Turtle is a liquidity distribution protocol that connects protocols needing liquidity with LPs looking for steadier incentives, and @turtledotxyz sets out the detail in its Q3
Group revenue reached $1.04M in Q3, up from SR is a credit desk that launched on 7 October, and its first vaults are Hare USD Earn and Hare Gold Earn.
Both vaults are powered by Aave, and the gold vault works with Paxos.
A distribution layer that already earns revenue can carry a new credit product without asking LPs to trust a promise first.
Hare's first vaults open in Q4, and the test is whether the same distribution that worked in Q3 keeps working at a larger scale.
359
35
319
8,227
Chexxe retweeted
Loud accounts fade, useful ones stay. What @TheDAOLabs posted today is basically that sentence with a scoring system attached
WhoTweets rates reputation as seriously as volume, so a careful explainer can outweigh a stream of filler, a rule the #DAOVERSE should keep
WhoTweets rates reputation as seriously as volume, so a careful explainer can outweigh a stream of filler, a rule the #DAOVERSE should keep
Follower counts and likes are still treated as the main sign of influence. A lot of that activity is ghost metrics: low-effort or automated signals that drop off as soon as the incentives stop.
Real contribution looks different. It shows up in original research, clear y participation that other people can actually look at and check. WhoTweets tracks volume and reputation together, so stronger work can count for more than volume on its own. Social Miners earn Rewards when the output holds up under review.
One can be bought. The other can be examined.
6
6
11
1,672
Chexxe retweeted
Bots liking bots is not a community 😂
The latest from @TheDAOLabs puts it nicely: follower numbers can be bought, but research and clear explanations can be examined by anyone. WhoTweets tracks both reputation and volume, and honestly the #DAOVERSE benefits
The latest from @TheDAOLabs puts it nicely: follower numbers can be bought, but research and clear explanations can be examined by anyone. WhoTweets tracks both reputation and volume, and honestly the #DAOVERSE benefits
Follower counts and likes are still treated as the main sign of influence. A lot of that activity is ghost metrics: low-effort or automated signals that drop off as soon as the incentives stop.
Real contribution looks different. It shows up in original research, clear y participation that other people can actually look at and check. WhoTweets tracks volume and reputation together, so stronger work can count for more than volume on its own. Social Miners earn Rewards when the output holds up under review.
One can be bought. The other can be examined.
21
6
24
1,976
