Pinned Tweet
John O'Keefe. Chris McCallum. Keith Boudreau.
Three men all murdered in Norfolk County (2 in Quincy, 1 where DA Michael Morrissey was present) that all had missing video footage of the events surrounding their murders.
Coleen Crawford, long employed by the Norfolk County DA's orensics personnel, is directly involved in the handling of all 3 cases.
🔹️O'Keefe's case having a myriad of missing and doctored footage from Canton PD, the town's street cameras, neighborhood cameras, and John O'Keefe's own home. Most of which we have never seen in their raw/unedited form or at all.
🔹️McCallum's video footage of the exterior of the bar when he was killed magically went missing. Speculative that's because Morrissey was present. If so, it's likely this very footage would've shown the DA present for the murder and would have to explain why the brothers weren't charged for months even though he witnessed the incident.
🔹️Boudreau's bar video footage of his murder also went missing. His estate later sued Crawford and Lt John Fanning. Crawford and Fanning were once connected in business for video forensics (business absolved February 2022).
What we are uncovering is systemic governmental corruption in the county that's been proven with the very court system built against unraveling their lies. All 3 cases experienced the same thin blue line protection that allowed John O'Keefe's murderers to never be investigated, Chris McCallum's murderers to be left off with minimal punishment, and Keith Boudreau's murderer to be protected.
The same investigators.
The same District Attorney's Office.
The same story yet different victims.
Three men all murdered in Norfolk County (2 in Quincy, 1 where DA Michael Morrissey was present) that all had missing video footage of the events surrounding their murders.
Coleen Crawford, long employed by the Norfolk County DA's orensics personnel, is directly involved in the handling of all 3 cases.
🔹️O'Keefe's case having a myriad of missing and doctored footage from Canton PD, the town's street cameras, neighborhood cameras, and John O'Keefe's own home. Most of which we have never seen in their raw/unedited form or at all.
🔹️McCallum's video footage of the exterior of the bar when he was killed magically went missing. Speculative that's because Morrissey was present. If so, it's likely this very footage would've shown the DA present for the murder and would have to explain why the brothers weren't charged for months even though he witnessed the incident.
🔹️Boudreau's bar video footage of his murder also went missing. His estate later sued Crawford and Lt John Fanning. Crawford and Fanning were once connected in business for video forensics (business absolved February 2022).
What we are uncovering is systemic governmental corruption in the county that's been proven with the very court system built against unraveling their lies. All 3 cases experienced the same thin blue line protection that allowed John O'Keefe's murderers to never be investigated, Chris McCallum's murderers to be left off with minimal punishment, and Keith Boudreau's murderer to be protected.
The same investigators.
The same District Attorney's Office.
The same story yet different victims.
119
480
1,985
240,539
BoozeyBeauty retweeted
a scarf, lanyard, belt, strap, rope...
depends which report you read.
depends which report you read.
A Canton police officer misidentified the duffel bag strap around Sandra’s neck as a "scarf," missing critical details about the buckle imprint left on her chest. This demonstrates the ME’s reliance on a faulty investigation.
#SandraBirchmoreTrial
4
14
105
2,769
Attorney for Matthew Farwell alluded today, during cross examination of the Commonwealth's medical examiner, that someone may have lifted the shirt and sweatshirt of Sandra Birchmore to expose her pregnant abdomen.
Steven's pointed to the fact that it looked like lividity on Sandra's abdomen was obvious and caused by her shirt. Some in the public, after viewing images that are no longer available on the DOJ's website, thought it might have been ner leggings.
There was no follow up on these questions by either side so I am left questioning: if Canton Police Ensley Cotard testified to the fact that he only touched the door handles in her apartment, who lifted up her shirt to expose her pregnancy for the photo's? Did someone else with Canton PD or the Massachusetts State Police do this?
Or... did Farwell do this when setting up the scene?
Hopefully we get clarity on this with future witnesses. Perhaps MSP John Fucker Fanning can clear this up.
Steven's pointed to the fact that it looked like lividity on Sandra's abdomen was obvious and caused by her shirt. Some in the public, after viewing images that are no longer available on the DOJ's website, thought it might have been ner leggings.
There was no follow up on these questions by either side so I am left questioning: if Canton Police Ensley Cotard testified to the fact that he only touched the door handles in her apartment, who lifted up her shirt to expose her pregnancy for the photo's? Did someone else with Canton PD or the Massachusetts State Police do this?
Or... did Farwell do this when setting up the scene?
Hopefully we get clarity on this with future witnesses. Perhaps MSP John Fucker Fanning can clear this up.
15
14
326
20,318
BoozeyBeauty retweeted
Billy Farwell just ran into a car! SPRINTING OUT of the court
18
10
243
15,213
Seeing the ligature that ended Sandra Birchmore's life was telling. It is smaller than anticipated at maybe 1.5inch thick. It was still in it's crinkled state as when it was found around her neck.
The medical examiner saying it was tight around her neck but could've been easily removed.
The medical examiner saying it was tight around her neck but could've been easily removed.
1
6
192
7,263
Lots of medical examiner images being portrayed today in the US vs Matthew Farwell trial as expected.
If there's anything to say: the more of these images I see, the clearer it is that Sandra Birchmore did not do this to herself.
If there's anything to say: the more of these images I see, the clearer it is that Sandra Birchmore did not do this to herself.
9
27
521
8,416
DAY 11 | Sandra Birchmore Trial
Three important witnesses are expected in court today: Diala Alkhalil, Dr. María del Mar Capó-Martínez, and William Farwell.
DIALA ALKHALIL — SANDRA’S THERAPIST
Alkhalil, a licensed mental health counselor, first treated Sandra when she was 10 or 11 years old and resumed treating her in 2016 after Sandra lost her mother and grandmother. She treated Sandra for anxiety, depression, grief, and panic attacks, and regularly assessed her mental health.
Her testimony is particularly important because their final therapy session took place on January 31, 2021 — the day before Sandra was found dead. Alkhalil testified that Sandra seemed more like herself, that her anxiety had decreased, and that she saw no indication of suicidal ideation. She also discussed Sandra’s pregnancy, her concerns about the baby, her recent Zoloft prescription, and a reported experience in which Sandra believed she saw her deceased mother holding her unborn child.
The defense is expected to continue challenging Alkhalil’s assessment, including Sandra’s mental health history, previous struggles, and the interpretation of that final session. The jury must weigh the therapist’s clinical observations against the defense’s argument that Sandra died by suicide.
DR. MARÍA DEL MAR CAPÓ-MARTÍNEZ — THE ORIGINAL MEDICAL EXAMINER
Capó-Martínez performed Sandra’s autopsy and originally determined that her cause of death was asphyxia by hanging and her manner of death was suicide. That determination became a central part of the initial investigation.
In May 2026, the Massachusetts Office of the Chief Medical Examiner amended Sandra’s death certificate, listing the cause as asphyxia and the manner as undetermined. Federal prosecutors now allege that Sandra was strangled and that her death was staged to look like a suicide.
Capó-Martínez’s testimony could be crucial to understanding the original autopsy, the injuries documented during the examination, how the initial cause and manner of death were determined, and what evidence informed that conclusion. Her testimony may also help explain the medical findings that are now being scrutinized alongside the prosecution’s theory of homicide.
WILLIAM FARWELL — MATTHEW FARWELL’S TWIN BROTHER
William Farwell is Matthew Farwell’s twin brother and another potentially significant witness because of his own reported relationship with Sandra. His testimony could provide the jury with additional context about his relationship with Sandra, his interactions with her, and what he knew about her relationship with his brother. His knowledge may also be relevant to the timeline and the circumstances surrounding Sandra’s final months.
Today’s testimony brings together three very different perspectives: Sandra’s mental state immediately before her death, the medical examination that originally classified her death as a suicide, and the testimony of Matthew Farwell’s own twin brother.
Three important witnesses are expected in court today: Diala Alkhalil, Dr. María del Mar Capó-Martínez, and William Farwell.
DIALA ALKHALIL — SANDRA’S THERAPIST
Alkhalil, a licensed mental health counselor, first treated Sandra when she was 10 or 11 years old and resumed treating her in 2016 after Sandra lost her mother and grandmother. She treated Sandra for anxiety, depression, grief, and panic attacks, and regularly assessed her mental health.
Her testimony is particularly important because their final therapy session took place on January 31, 2021 — the day before Sandra was found dead. Alkhalil testified that Sandra seemed more like herself, that her anxiety had decreased, and that she saw no indication of suicidal ideation. She also discussed Sandra’s pregnancy, her concerns about the baby, her recent Zoloft prescription, and a reported experience in which Sandra believed she saw her deceased mother holding her unborn child.
The defense is expected to continue challenging Alkhalil’s assessment, including Sandra’s mental health history, previous struggles, and the interpretation of that final session. The jury must weigh the therapist’s clinical observations against the defense’s argument that Sandra died by suicide.
DR. MARÍA DEL MAR CAPÓ-MARTÍNEZ — THE ORIGINAL MEDICAL EXAMINER
Capó-Martínez performed Sandra’s autopsy and originally determined that her cause of death was asphyxia by hanging and her manner of death was suicide. That determination became a central part of the initial investigation.
In May 2026, the Massachusetts Office of the Chief Medical Examiner amended Sandra’s death certificate, listing the cause as asphyxia and the manner as undetermined. Federal prosecutors now allege that Sandra was strangled and that her death was staged to look like a suicide.
Capó-Martínez’s testimony could be crucial to understanding the original autopsy, the injuries documented during the examination, how the initial cause and manner of death were determined, and what evidence informed that conclusion. Her testimony may also help explain the medical findings that are now being scrutinized alongside the prosecution’s theory of homicide.
WILLIAM FARWELL — MATTHEW FARWELL’S TWIN BROTHER
William Farwell is Matthew Farwell’s twin brother and another potentially significant witness because of his own reported relationship with Sandra. His testimony could provide the jury with additional context about his relationship with Sandra, his interactions with her, and what he knew about her relationship with his brother. His knowledge may also be relevant to the timeline and the circumstances surrounding Sandra’s final months.
Today’s testimony brings together three very different perspectives: Sandra’s mental state immediately before her death, the medical examination that originally classified her death as a suicide, and the testimony of Matthew Farwell’s own twin brother.
3
11
173
6,026
Matthew Farwell received his phone back the same day he gave it to Mass State Police.
Karen Read still doesn't have 2 cell phones back that were given in Feb 2024 over witness intimidation charges that a grand jury did not indict her on.
Matthew Farwell is currently on trial in federal court for the murder of Sandra Birchmore.
Karen Read was acquitted of the murder of John O'Keefe in 2025.
Karen Read still doesn't have 2 cell phones back that were given in Feb 2024 over witness intimidation charges that a grand jury did not indict her on.
Matthew Farwell is currently on trial in federal court for the murder of Sandra Birchmore.
Karen Read was acquitted of the murder of John O'Keefe in 2025.
24
115
1,032
20,469
BoozeyBeauty retweeted
Just stop! This is my message for those posting comments blaming Sandra Birchmore for other sexual encounters besides Matthew Farwell. Someone commented on a Facebook post recently about Sandra Birchmore: “She’s no angel! What was done to her was wrong, but she knew what she was ”
That statement and others like it reflect a profound misunderstanding of grooming and childhood sexual exploitation.
As I explained on @JusticeServedTV Sandra's sexual encounters with other men cannot be separated from the grooming that began when she was just 12 years old.
Grooming is not simply about obtaining sex from a child. It is about systematically dismantling that child's understanding of love, trust, boundaries, and relationships.
Farwell exploited Sandra's vulnerabilities and her admiration for police officers. Through years of relentless manipulation, he conditioned her to associate sexual availability with affection, acceptance, and approval.
This is the reason groomers like Farwell can continue to sexually exploit victims into adulthood and leave them vulnerable to exploitation by others. That conditioning did not disappear when Sandra turned 18.
A birthday does not erase years of psychological manipulation.
What some characterize as promiscuity, actually reflects the lasting consequences of childhood sexual exploitation. Sandra's adult behavior must be understood in the context of what was done to her as a child.
As a Juvenile Court judge for more than two decades, I saw firsthand how grooming and sexual trauma can distort a young person's understanding of relationships and personal boundaries.
Stop judging and blaming Sandra for behaviors shaped by years of grooming that distorted her understanding of personal boundaries and left her vulnerable to continued sexual exploitation. Just stop.
That statement and others like it reflect a profound misunderstanding of grooming and childhood sexual exploitation.
As I explained on @JusticeServedTV Sandra's sexual encounters with other men cannot be separated from the grooming that began when she was just 12 years old.
Grooming is not simply about obtaining sex from a child. It is about systematically dismantling that child's understanding of love, trust, boundaries, and relationships.
Farwell exploited Sandra's vulnerabilities and her admiration for police officers. Through years of relentless manipulation, he conditioned her to associate sexual availability with affection, acceptance, and approval.
This is the reason groomers like Farwell can continue to sexually exploit victims into adulthood and leave them vulnerable to exploitation by others. That conditioning did not disappear when Sandra turned 18.
A birthday does not erase years of psychological manipulation.
What some characterize as promiscuity, actually reflects the lasting consequences of childhood sexual exploitation. Sandra's adult behavior must be understood in the context of what was done to her as a child.
As a Juvenile Court judge for more than two decades, I saw firsthand how grooming and sexual trauma can distort a young person's understanding of relationships and personal boundaries.
Stop judging and blaming Sandra for behaviors shaped by years of grooming that distorted her understanding of personal boundaries and left her vulnerable to continued sexual exploitation. Just stop.
160
278
2,162
58,310
Canton Police knew of a threat to Sandra Birchmore by Matthew Farwell on the first day of the investigation. This tip was given to Sgt Michael Lank.
Lank, one year later in the John O'Keefe death investigation, would be in 34 Fairview Rd to "interview" Brian Albert, Nicole Cabe as Sgt Sean Goode held onto O'Keefe's phone. Lank would not testify to the fact that O'Keefe's phone was present for these interviews.
Lank also received a phone call prior to calling MSP CPAC unit and entering 34 Fairview Rd - he said he couldn't recall who this call was from.
Lank is still on the Canton Police Department and has received several promotions since Sandra and John's murders.
My coverage of Sandra's death investigation, including details of friends statements that MSP ignored, can be found here:
youtube.com/live/CPKuIJ_FE…
Lank, one year later in the John O'Keefe death investigation, would be in 34 Fairview Rd to "interview" Brian Albert, Nicole Cabe as Sgt Sean Goode held onto O'Keefe's phone. Lank would not testify to the fact that O'Keefe's phone was present for these interviews.
Lank also received a phone call prior to calling MSP CPAC unit and entering 34 Fairview Rd - he said he couldn't recall who this call was from.
Lank is still on the Canton Police Department and has received several promotions since Sandra and John's murders.
My coverage of Sandra's death investigation, including details of friends statements that MSP ignored, can be found here:
youtube.com/live/CPKuIJ_FE…
22
109
705
21,546
A young girl can join a children's police program, be obsessed with all things authority, and not be brought to the library for "private tutoring" by one of the cops. Then, subsequently, lose her virginity to said cop.
Age and location don't cause grooming, pedophiles do.
Age and location don't cause grooming, pedophiles do.
A woman can be drunk and half clothed and won't be raped if there's not a rapist in the room. Liquor and clothing don't cause rape, rapist do.
5
20
334
6,659
On April 10th, 2013, Sandra Birchmore was 15. Matthew Farwell was about to turn 27. Intercourse with Birchmore on that date is statutory rate by law.
"In Massachusetts, sexual intercourse with a child under 16 is rape of a child under G.L. c. 265, § 23. The child’s consent is convicted under § 23 faces imprisonment in state prison for life or for any term of years. The Commonwealth may indict a person for rape of a child at any time after the offense. G.L. c. 277, § 63.
The Norfolk County District Attorney’s Office received the Stoughton Police Department’s findings in 2022. No Massachusetts prosecutor has charged Mr. Farwell with rape of a child or with any other crime."
"In Massachusetts, sexual intercourse with a child under 16 is rape of a child under G.L. c. 265, § 23. The child’s consent is convicted under § 23 faces imprisonment in state prison for life or for any term of years. The Commonwealth may indict a person for rape of a child at any time after the offense. G.L. c. 277, § 63.
The Norfolk County District Attorney’s Office received the Stoughton Police Department’s findings in 2022. No Massachusetts prosecutor has charged Mr. Farwell with rape of a child or with any other crime."
12
54
400
10,326
BoozeyBeauty retweeted
@1_and_only_Wade imagine telling the world this was “my friend, who i loved” and the only image anyone has ever seen of you together is when you literally turned your back on his dead body
4
22
142
3,280
BoozeyBeauty retweeted
They've switched slides in the PowerPoint Presentation...
Next up: "defamation is not covered under the First Amendment"
Next up: "defamation is not covered under the First Amendment"
19
6
75
5,538
Norfolk County officials refused to pursue a state grand jury of Matthew Farwell for killing Sandra Birchmore - even after a meeting with Federal investigators.
After review of more evidence, supplied by the Feds, the medical examiner changed Birchmore's manner of death from "suicide" to "undetermined".
Similar to the John O'Keefe death investigation, Massachusetts State Police assumed an immediate conclusion of how Sandra died before any investigation was started. They worked from the point of view that she had killed herself. This would deeply affect how the investigation would continue.
Witnesses almost immediately came forward to implicate Matthew Farwell. Some police officers from MSP, Canton and Stoughton would chose to ignore these statements - some would use it as leverage to target those who questioned the narrative.
In the current Federal trial, it is important to know that we are only getting a small sampling of what happened to Sandra. The focus of this trial is her, which is the only thing that matters at the point in time.
However, when trial is over and the jury comes back with a likely "guilty" verdict, keep your eyes peeled on Canton, Stoughton, MSP and the DA's office. Because it is of my opinion that Farwell's trial is only step 1. The Birchmore investigation is complete. The O'Keefe investigation is complete. But it seems like something is coming up the pipeline and the Federal government has only just gotten started.
🩵💙🩵💙🩵💙
After review of more evidence, supplied by the Feds, the medical examiner changed Birchmore's manner of death from "suicide" to "undetermined".
Similar to the John O'Keefe death investigation, Massachusetts State Police assumed an immediate conclusion of how Sandra died before any investigation was started. They worked from the point of view that she had killed herself. This would deeply affect how the investigation would continue.
Witnesses almost immediately came forward to implicate Matthew Farwell. Some police officers from MSP, Canton and Stoughton would chose to ignore these statements - some would use it as leverage to target those who questioned the narrative.
In the current Federal trial, it is important to know that we are only getting a small sampling of what happened to Sandra. The focus of this trial is her, which is the only thing that matters at the point in time.
However, when trial is over and the jury comes back with a likely "guilty" verdict, keep your eyes peeled on Canton, Stoughton, MSP and the DA's office. Because it is of my opinion that Farwell's trial is only step 1. The Birchmore investigation is complete. The O'Keefe investigation is complete. But it seems like something is coming up the pipeline and the Federal government has only just gotten started.
🩵💙🩵💙🩵💙
33
75
881
42,345
🙂🙃🙂🙃🙂
If you don’t know, Chief Donna McNamara was suspended by the Town of Stoughton because she had another tranche of data for the FBI; she was ready to expose at least one more current police officer in her ranks… With the Matthew Farwell trial, that name is starting to gain focus.
4
5
163
11,484
BoozeyBeauty retweeted
⬇️⬇️⬇️ For those who called out the same type of conduct during Karen Read, the U.S. v. Matthew Farwell trial is proving that the MSP in CPAC at NCDAO will conspire to ignore, mishandle, or skew an investigation away from a potential murder suspect if that suspect is a cop.
attorney peter elikann asks the question everyone should be asking:
“what is going on with the CANTON POLICE department, STOUGHTON POLICE department, MASSACHUSETTS STATE POLICE, and the NORFOLK DAs office ?”
fix the toxic culture + stop the coverups - victims deserve justice !
9
32
282
7,750
BoozeyBeauty retweeted
Why have I never seen a single photograph of Jennifer McCabe with John O’Keefe? I feel like that would exist if this close friendship actually existed.
How sad is it when people have to pretend Jen did CPR to make her look better.
Imagine being such a terrible “friend” that you have to make up a story from whole cloth just to hide how evil you actually are.
How sad it is that gaslighting people to believing this, when there’s audio showing the exact opposite
14
11
201
3,247
