invoker🎮 retweeted
#InfoFi is back
@KaitoStudio_ is back
@creator_wire is back
Everyone suddenly believes in rewarding quality content again. 😂
So, @cookie3 , what's taking you so long?
Image source: @Lexioryn
@KaitoStudio_ is back
@creator_wire is back
Everyone suddenly believes in rewarding quality content again. 😂
So, @cookie3 , what's taking you so long?
Image source: @Lexioryn
55
3
91
667
#InfoFi is back
@KaitoStudio_ is back
@creator_wire is back
Everyone suddenly believes in rewarding quality content again. 😂
So, @cookie3 , what's taking you so long?
Image source: @Lexioryn
@KaitoStudio_ is back
@creator_wire is back
Everyone suddenly believes in rewarding quality content again. 😂
So, @cookie3 , what's taking you so long?
Image source: @Lexioryn
55
3
91
667
invoker🎮 retweeted
533,500 $XEF over 30 days is the headline. Being able to track and claim the rewards through @merkl_xyz is the part I appreciate.
@Xeffy_io XAX Vault campaign adds token incentives on top of base yield for USDT depositors, with one place to follow the rewards.
My order of t, withdrawal terms second, incentives third.
Extra rewards are welcome. But if the vault only looks attractive with the bonus, what happens when those 30 days end?
@Xeffy_io XAX Vault campaign adds token incentives on top of base yield for USDT depositors, with one place to follow the rewards.
My order of t, withdrawal terms second, incentives third.
Extra rewards are welcome. But if the vault only looks attractive with the bonus, what happens when those 30 days end?
99
1
104
3,164
Crypto has been screaming “RWA to trillions” for years
Meanwhile, @Ondo is actually putting portfolios onchain
$30M+ TVL in under a month. Up 46% in a week
7 portfolios, including 3 built on BlackRock strategies. One token per portfolio
No need to pick 20 different assets le the exposure
$30M isn't a trillion. Not even close
But I'd rather see real capital flowing in than another 100-slide RWA pitch deck
Bullish on where this is heading
@OndoPerps
Meanwhile, @Ondo is actually putting portfolios onchain
$30M+ TVL in under a month. Up 46% in a week
7 portfolios, including 3 built on BlackRock strategies. One token per portfolio
No need to pick 20 different assets le the exposure
$30M isn't a trillion. Not even close
But I'd rather see real capital flowing in than another 100-slide RWA pitch deck
Bullish on where this is heading
@OndoPerps
50
11
76
8,145
Your trading capital sits idle, earning nothing. Apparently, that's considered normal.
@grvt_io wants to change that with Earn + Yield as Margin.
➥ Up to 11% APY on eligible assets, while also using them as trading collateral.
Finally, capital that doesn't just sit around rade.
Just don't mistake APY for a liquidation shield. A bad 20x trade can wipe out a year's yield in minutes.
Still bullish on making idle capital work harder
$GRVT
@grvt_io wants to change that with Earn + Yield as Margin.
➥ Up to 11% APY on eligible assets, while also using them as trading collateral.
Finally, capital that doesn't just sit around rade.
Just don't mistake APY for a liquidation shield. A bad 20x trade can wipe out a year's yield in minutes.
Still bullish on making idle capital work harder
$GRVT
145
15
156
3,447
533,500 $XEF over 30 days is the headline. Being able to track and claim the rewards through @merkl_xyz is the part I appreciate.
@Xeffy_io XAX Vault campaign adds token incentives on top of base yield for USDT depositors, with one place to follow the rewards.
My order of t, withdrawal terms second, incentives third.
Extra rewards are welcome. But if the vault only looks attractive with the bonus, what happens when those 30 days end?
@Xeffy_io XAX Vault campaign adds token incentives on top of base yield for USDT depositors, with one place to follow the rewards.
My order of t, withdrawal terms second, incentives third.
Extra rewards are welcome. But if the vault only looks attractive with the bonus, what happens when those 30 days end?
99
1
104
3,164
Aged cheddar is one of those “simple” ingredients that can still reset your palate. Hard to beat a reminder that flavor doesn’t always need to be complicated.
Most of you know I eat mostly plant-based these days, not strictly but I aspire to build a lot of flavor from those ingredients first
I had 12 year aged Wisconsin cheddar this evening and my palate was like fireworks! Wow
27
0
30
405
Launching a memecoin takes seconds. Keeping it alive for 48 hours is apparently a miracle.
Pumpfun made creating tokens easy. Traders made loyalty extinct.
Now a 2-day-old coin is called “dead” because a newer ticker just dropped.
We wanted the next DOGE. We built a 24/7 exit liquidity factory.
Pumpfun made creating tokens easy. Traders made loyalty extinct.
Now a 2-day-old coin is called “dead” because a newer ticker just dropped.
We wanted the next DOGE. We built a 24/7 exit liquidity factory.
12
0
24
498
invoker🎮 retweeted
A buyback won’t make someone switch trading platforms. But how it’s handled can matter to users deciding whether to hold the platform’s token.
@grvt_io bought 1.1M ethereum:0xad29f2723fcdbcf665f210f25e06f97477e417cf on the open market and permanently burned it, nearly 1% of e.
For holders, the distinction is simple: those tokens can’t later be distributed as incentives or sold from a treasury. That specific amount is gone for good.
The public dashboard also gives users something useful: a way to check purchases, cumulative burns and tx hashes themselves. Future updates can be compared with an actual record.
That makes GRVT easier to evaluate. A user considering ethereum:0xad29f2723fcdbcf665f210f25e06f97477e417cf can look at what the issuer has executed, instead of putting full weight on future promises.
Further buybacks are intended monthly, at the issuer’s discretion. There’s no fixed monthly amount, and a burn doesn’t guarantee price gains.
My bullish takeaway is the accountability. GRVT 2.0 starts with a completed action that holders can verify and track over time. That’s a stronger basis for earning their attention and trust.
@grvt_io bought 1.1M ethereum:0xad29f2723fcdbcf665f210f25e06f97477e417cf on the open market and permanently burned it, nearly 1% of e.
For holders, the distinction is simple: those tokens can’t later be distributed as incentives or sold from a treasury. That specific amount is gone for good.
The public dashboard also gives users something useful: a way to check purchases, cumulative burns and tx hashes themselves. Future updates can be compared with an actual record.
That makes GRVT easier to evaluate. A user considering ethereum:0xad29f2723fcdbcf665f210f25e06f97477e417cf can look at what the issuer has executed, instead of putting full weight on future promises.
Further buybacks are intended monthly, at the issuer’s discretion. There’s no fixed monthly amount, and a burn doesn’t guarantee price gains.
My bullish takeaway is the accountability. GRVT 2.0 starts with a completed action that holders can verify and track over time. That’s a stronger basis for earning their attention and trust.
97
1
98
4,456
invoker🎮 retweeted
The strongest case for a Starknet L1 is control over when security upgrades happen.
A team can have replacement cryptography ready and still depend on another network to finish the job.
@Starknet Quantum Hub shows where that happens: its normal blob data path uses Ethereum’s ta offers a fallback, but bridge and messaging dependencies remain tied to Ethereum’s migration.
For builders, that means their security roadmap includes decisions they don’t control.
Hash-based STARK proofs and programmable accounts help Starknet adapt within its own stack. Exploring an independent L1 asks whether it should control more of that stack.
I think that research is worth doing. But autonomy comes with responsibility: any proposal needs to explain how it would secure the functions Ethereum currently provides.
That’s the test I’d apply: which dependencies disappear, what replaces them, and can users migrate safely?
Starknet is preparing for quantum threats. Independence remains under exploration.
Source: Quantum Hub and governance discussion, reviewed Oct 23, 2026.
quantum.starkware.co
A team can have replacement cryptography ready and still depend on another network to finish the job.
@Starknet Quantum Hub shows where that happens: its normal blob data path uses Ethereum’s ta offers a fallback, but bridge and messaging dependencies remain tied to Ethereum’s migration.
For builders, that means their security roadmap includes decisions they don’t control.
Hash-based STARK proofs and programmable accounts help Starknet adapt within its own stack. Exploring an independent L1 asks whether it should control more of that stack.
I think that research is worth doing. But autonomy comes with responsibility: any proposal needs to explain how it would secure the functions Ethereum currently provides.
That’s the test I’d apply: which dependencies disappear, what replaces them, and can users migrate safely?
Starknet is preparing for quantum threats. Independence remains under exploration.
Source: Quantum Hub and governance discussion, reviewed Oct 23, 2026.
quantum.starkware.co
46
9
59
580
Keeping a stock position shouldn’t always mean funding a separate trading balance.
That’s the useful part of @bitget rToken Transfer for me. Supported broker holdings convert into rTokens, and eligible tokens can count as futures margin without selling them first.
For someone ading crypto, that can reduce the need to split capital across accounts.
I’d still leave a healthy margin buffer. If the stock drops while the perp loses, both eat into the same cushion.
More flexibility with the capital you hold. Same need to manage the total risk.
That’s the useful part of @bitget rToken Transfer for me. Supported broker holdings convert into rTokens, and eligible tokens can count as futures margin without selling them first.
For someone ading crypto, that can reduce the need to split capital across accounts.
I’d still leave a healthy margin buffer. If the stock drops while the perp loses, both eat into the same cushion.
More flexibility with the capital you hold. Same need to manage the total risk.
33
1
32
1,828
The strongest case for a Starknet L1 is control over when security upgrades happen.
A team can have replacement cryptography ready and still depend on another network to finish the job.
@Starknet Quantum Hub shows where that happens: its normal blob data path uses Ethereum’s ta offers a fallback, but bridge and messaging dependencies remain tied to Ethereum’s migration.
For builders, that means their security roadmap includes decisions they don’t control.
Hash-based STARK proofs and programmable accounts help Starknet adapt within its own stack. Exploring an independent L1 asks whether it should control more of that stack.
I think that research is worth doing. But autonomy comes with responsibility: any proposal needs to explain how it would secure the functions Ethereum currently provides.
That’s the test I’d apply: which dependencies disappear, what replaces them, and can users migrate safely?
Starknet is preparing for quantum threats. Independence remains under exploration.
Source: Quantum Hub and governance discussion, reviewed Oct 23, 2026.
quantum.starkware.co
A team can have replacement cryptography ready and still depend on another network to finish the job.
@Starknet Quantum Hub shows where that happens: its normal blob data path uses Ethereum’s ta offers a fallback, but bridge and messaging dependencies remain tied to Ethereum’s migration.
For builders, that means their security roadmap includes decisions they don’t control.
Hash-based STARK proofs and programmable accounts help Starknet adapt within its own stack. Exploring an independent L1 asks whether it should control more of that stack.
I think that research is worth doing. But autonomy comes with responsibility: any proposal needs to explain how it would secure the functions Ethereum currently provides.
That’s the test I’d apply: which dependencies disappear, what replaces them, and can users migrate safely?
Starknet is preparing for quantum threats. Independence remains under exploration.
Source: Quantum Hub and governance discussion, reviewed Oct 23, 2026.
quantum.starkware.co
46
9
59
580
A buyback won’t make someone switch trading platforms. But how it’s handled can matter to users deciding whether to hold the platform’s token.
@grvt_io bought 1.1M ethereum:0xad29f2723fcdbcf665f210f25e06f97477e417cf on the open market and permanently burned it, nearly 1% of e.
For holders, the distinction is simple: those tokens can’t later be distributed as incentives or sold from a treasury. That specific amount is gone for good.
The public dashboard also gives users something useful: a way to check purchases, cumulative burns and tx hashes themselves. Future updates can be compared with an actual record.
That makes GRVT easier to evaluate. A user considering ethereum:0xad29f2723fcdbcf665f210f25e06f97477e417cf can look at what the issuer has executed, instead of putting full weight on future promises.
Further buybacks are intended monthly, at the issuer’s discretion. There’s no fixed monthly amount, and a burn doesn’t guarantee price gains.
My bullish takeaway is the accountability. GRVT 2.0 starts with a completed action that holders can verify and track over time. That’s a stronger basis for earning their attention and trust.
@grvt_io bought 1.1M ethereum:0xad29f2723fcdbcf665f210f25e06f97477e417cf on the open market and permanently burned it, nearly 1% of e.
For holders, the distinction is simple: those tokens can’t later be distributed as incentives or sold from a treasury. That specific amount is gone for good.
The public dashboard also gives users something useful: a way to check purchases, cumulative burns and tx hashes themselves. Future updates can be compared with an actual record.
That makes GRVT easier to evaluate. A user considering ethereum:0xad29f2723fcdbcf665f210f25e06f97477e417cf can look at what the issuer has executed, instead of putting full weight on future promises.
Further buybacks are intended monthly, at the issuer’s discretion. There’s no fixed monthly amount, and a burn doesn’t guarantee price gains.
My bullish takeaway is the accountability. GRVT 2.0 starts with a completed action that holders can verify and track over time. That’s a stronger basis for earning their attention and trust.
97
1
98
4,456
Stocks, FX, commodities and crypto shouldn’t need four separate piles of trading capital.
That’s why I’m bullish on @grvt_io GRVT 2.0 direction: a unified self-custodial balance connecting trading and earning.
Stable Funding Perps are planned for November, with 0 trading fees, once-daily funding and a target of 1,000+ markets by December 2026. Funding and spreads still count toward costs.
For me, the appeal is having more places to trade without constantly splitting funds across platforms.
The first buyback already removed 1.1M ethereum:0xad29f2723fcdbcf665f210f25e06f97477e417cf permanently. Now the roadmap gives users more reasons to bring capital in and put it to work.
That’s why I’m bullish on @grvt_io GRVT 2.0 direction: a unified self-custodial balance connecting trading and earning.
Stable Funding Perps are planned for November, with 0 trading fees, once-daily funding and a target of 1,000+ markets by December 2026. Funding and spreads still count toward costs.
For me, the appeal is having more places to trade without constantly splitting funds across platforms.
The first buyback already removed 1.1M ethereum:0xad29f2723fcdbcf665f210f25e06f97477e417cf permanently. Now the roadmap gives users more reasons to bring capital in and put it to work.
100
11
145
5,430
Crypto exchanges don’t expand into every market the same way
In Thailand, Bitget is reportedly exploring the acquisition of an existing licensed exchange rather than starting from zero
That approach could offer three advantages:
➥ An established local operating structure
➥ market with strict crypto oversight
➥ Less need to build every part of the local business from scratch
The reported opportunity comes as the current owner is looking to exit the sector, potentially opening the door for a new operator
If completed, the deal could strengthen Bitget’s presence in Southeast Asia , but an acquisition alone doesn’t guarantee approval for every service or product
Worth watching how this develops, especially as regulation increasingly shapes where crypto platforms can operate and how they compete
In Thailand, Bitget is reportedly exploring the acquisition of an existing licensed exchange rather than starting from zero
That approach could offer three advantages:
➥ An established local operating structure
➥ market with strict crypto oversight
➥ Less need to build every part of the local business from scratch
The reported opportunity comes as the current owner is looking to exit the sector, potentially opening the door for a new operator
If completed, the deal could strengthen Bitget’s presence in Southeast Asia , but an acquisition alone doesn’t guarantee approval for every service or product
Worth watching how this develops, especially as regulation increasingly shapes where crypto platforms can operate and how they compete
Bitget announces the planned acquisition of GMO-Z.com Cryptonomics (Thailand), providing an opportunity for Bitget to establish a stronger operational presence in Thailand.
GMO.Z.com Cryptonomics is a Bangkok-based licensed digital asset exchange ut more 👇
bitget.com/blog/articles/…
34
0
37
519
invoker🎮 retweeted
I trade Gold quite often, but I don’t always find a good setup
That’s why I keep an eye on other markets too. Tech indices, industrial metals and energy can all react to different macro factors
Bitget CFD just added 8 new markets, including $HSTECH, $TWRICC, aluminum, zinc and atch when GOLD isn’t giving a clear setup
No need to force a trade. Every market has its own risks, especially with leverage
That’s why I keep an eye on other markets too. Tech indices, industrial metals and energy can all react to different macro factors
Bitget CFD just added 8 new markets, including $HSTECH, $TWRICC, aluminum, zinc and atch when GOLD isn’t giving a clear setup
No need to force a trade. Every market has its own risks, especially with leverage
39
1
59
548
I trade Gold quite often, but I don’t always find a good setup
That’s why I keep an eye on other markets too. Tech indices, industrial metals and energy can all react to different macro factors
Bitget CFD just added 8 new markets, including $HSTECH, $TWRICC, aluminum, zinc and atch when GOLD isn’t giving a clear setup
No need to force a trade. Every market has its own risks, especially with leverage
That’s why I keep an eye on other markets too. Tech indices, industrial metals and energy can all react to different macro factors
Bitget CFD just added 8 new markets, including $HSTECH, $TWRICC, aluminum, zinc and atch when GOLD isn’t giving a clear setup
No need to force a trade. Every market has its own risks, especially with leverage
39
1
59
548
