Pinned Tweet
My apprenticeship gave me some of the best days of my life & equipped me with the skills needed to lead businesses at the forefront of the auto industry. For employers & employees alike, apprenticeships add huge value. Find out more in this film with @thetimes & @bizsupportgovuk.
42
99
401
October Sales in U.K. Fri @SMMT - normally a slow month ahead of December push.
BEV 32% marketshare and will easily achieve the adjusted ZEV mandate for 2026. BEV now on track to overtake Petrol sales, undoubtedly a result of fuel price hikes caused by the Iranian conflict. Diesel is dead.
BEV plus PHEV / REEV likely to exceed 50% marketshare as consumers understand the need for energy diversity.
The mandate is working @jreynoldsMP but consumer behaviour will always correlate closely to pump prices as we ween ourselves off the oil dependency.
BEV 32% marketshare and will easily achieve the adjusted ZEV mandate for 2026. BEV now on track to overtake Petrol sales, undoubtedly a result of fuel price hikes caused by the Iranian conflict. Diesel is dead.
BEV plus PHEV / REEV likely to exceed 50% marketshare as consumers understand the need for energy diversity.
The mandate is working @jreynoldsMP but consumer behaviour will always correlate closely to pump prices as we ween ourselves off the oil dependency.
6
8
52
2,838
Dr. Andy Palmer retweeted
Year-end push lifts EV sales but Mandate gap set to widen
Battery electric cars take 32.0% of registrations as buyers respond to growing model choice and compelling offers, but year-to-date share just 26.6%.
smmt.co.uk/year-end-push-âŠ
Battery electric cars take 32.0% of registrations as buyers respond to growing model choice and compelling offers, but year-to-date share just 26.6%.
smmt.co.uk/year-end-push-âŠ
6
12
32
1,931
A pleasure to catch up with Olivier François ex-global CEO of Fiat while concurrently holding the role of Global Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) for Stellantis. Lots of old war stories!
1
1
29
1,571
Chery moving their design headquarters to the UK would be good news for our domestic industry. The Chinese car industry still has a long way to go and the merging of British design experience with Chinese manufacturing know-how would be good for everyone, not least motorists. I've long advocated for Britain being a destination for Chinese OEMs, but we need the government to drive that ambition.
thetimes.com/business/compaâŠ
thetimes.com/business/compaâŠ
9
6
68
4,946
Britainâs mobile phone network is really unfit for purpose. Particularly when doing what a MOBILE network is supposed to do â moving!
Iâm on @EE which is supposed to have the best coverage in U.K. - itâs awful!
This isnât an inherent problem with 5G. Other countries have deployed the same technology far more successfully. Opensignal ranks Britain LAST among 29 European markets for mobile network performance. Denmark achieves 226 Mbps average download speeds against Britainâs 84 Mbps.
So what went wrong?
5G typically uses higher frequencies than legacy networks, with shorter effective range and poorer penetration into buildings and vehicles. Reliable coverage therefore requires sufficient mast density, capacity and overlapping cells to maintain connectivity during handovers.
Britain hasnât invested adequately in that infrastructure. Much of our 5G still depends on 4G architecture, while the closure of 3G has removed a legacy fallback. Add network congestion, patchy rural coverage and unreliable handovers, and the result is familiar: phones displaying 5G but unable to transfer data, connections disappearing on motorways and trains, and calls dropping mid-conversation.
And where is @Ofcom?
It proudly reports 99%+ outdoor 4G premises coverage. But that figure is based on predicted signal strength, NOT independently verified, continuous connectivity. Indeed, Ofcomâs own figures show that only 84% of UK landmass has predicted good 4G coverage from all operators.
A signal at a stationary address is not the same as a usable connection travelling at 70 mph.
Ofcom has overseen the transition to 5G and the retirement of 3G without ensuring that network resilience, capacity and reliable handovers meet the needs of mobile users.
Why arenât operators required to demonstrate real-world connectivity along roads and railways, with published measurements of dropped calls, failed handovers and data interruptions?
We have confused the availability of a technology with the delivery of a service.
A mobile network that cannot reliably maintain a connection while mobile is fundamentally failing its purpose.
Ofcom should be held accountable.
Iâm on @EE which is supposed to have the best coverage in U.K. - itâs awful!
This isnât an inherent problem with 5G. Other countries have deployed the same technology far more successfully. Opensignal ranks Britain LAST among 29 European markets for mobile network performance. Denmark achieves 226 Mbps average download speeds against Britainâs 84 Mbps.
So what went wrong?
5G typically uses higher frequencies than legacy networks, with shorter effective range and poorer penetration into buildings and vehicles. Reliable coverage therefore requires sufficient mast density, capacity and overlapping cells to maintain connectivity during handovers.
Britain hasnât invested adequately in that infrastructure. Much of our 5G still depends on 4G architecture, while the closure of 3G has removed a legacy fallback. Add network congestion, patchy rural coverage and unreliable handovers, and the result is familiar: phones displaying 5G but unable to transfer data, connections disappearing on motorways and trains, and calls dropping mid-conversation.
And where is @Ofcom?
It proudly reports 99%+ outdoor 4G premises coverage. But that figure is based on predicted signal strength, NOT independently verified, continuous connectivity. Indeed, Ofcomâs own figures show that only 84% of UK landmass has predicted good 4G coverage from all operators.
A signal at a stationary address is not the same as a usable connection travelling at 70 mph.
Ofcom has overseen the transition to 5G and the retirement of 3G without ensuring that network resilience, capacity and reliable handovers meet the needs of mobile users.
Why arenât operators required to demonstrate real-world connectivity along roads and railways, with published measurements of dropped calls, failed handovers and data interruptions?
We have confused the availability of a technology with the delivery of a service.
A mobile network that cannot reliably maintain a connection while mobile is fundamentally failing its purpose.
Ofcom should be held accountable.
150
88
734
85,987
Honoured to be a judge on the Temporis International Awards for watches. The highlight for me was this watch, the LMB from the Grandson of Lamborghini. Congratulations to all the winners.
7
1
36
4,394
cannot let the evening go without mentioning the most mechanically inspiring winner and the Juryâs choice - the ARMIN STROM
0
0
0
378
This hurts to write (letâs call it tough love), but I believe that in full transparency, in advocating for EVs one must also acknowledge the downsides. My company leases a BYD Sealion (and other EVâs on the fleet) - on paper, itâs great value for money. A Chinese car @BYDCompany leased via @santanderuk But then we had an issue with a door harness - took the car to Hartwell Bracknell; they canât fix the car - itâs been off the road 71 days chasing faults around the car. Santander donât want to answer the phone (2.5hrs on hold today) and BYD are unhelpful with a car that has a seemly a catastrophic fault.
The cars a lemon (and frankly so are the leasing company and the dealer), the question really is, are all their cars lemons or is this a one-off?
Clearly BYD arenât ready for scale in U.K. and donât have the dealer back up youâd expect of a mass brand - so as much as I advocate for low cost EVs, my advice at least in the short term, is steer clear of the BYD! The same might be said of Santander leases and Hartwell dealers!
I will of course update you on any progress!
The cars a lemon (and frankly so are the leasing company and the dealer), the question really is, are all their cars lemons or is this a one-off?
Clearly BYD arenât ready for scale in U.K. and donât have the dealer back up youâd expect of a mass brand - so as much as I advocate for low cost EVs, my advice at least in the short term, is steer clear of the BYD! The same might be said of Santander leases and Hartwell dealers!
I will of course update you on any progress!
155
66
529
248,246
Dr. Andy Palmer retweeted
Il y a 10 ans, on nous disait quâil Ă©tait impossible de produire des batteries Ă©lectriques en Europe et que lâautomobile française ne ferait pas le poids face Ă la concurrence mondiale.
Impossible nâest pas Français !
Aujourdâhui nous avons 4 gigafactories en France, taines de milliers de vĂ©hicules Ă©lectriques et nos R4 et R5 sortent de nos usines avec des batteries fabriquĂ©es chez nous.
Câest trĂšs concret, câest bon pour nos emplois, notre Ă©conomie, et cohĂ©rent avec nos objectifs climatiques.
Au Mondial de lâAuto ce matin, jâai rĂ©affirmĂ© une ambition claire : notre industrie automobile française et europĂ©enne innove, accĂ©lĂšre et se rĂ©industrialise. Nous devons continuer et aller plus loin.
Trois priorités :
1. Protéger notre industrie.
Lâaccord engagĂ© entre lâUnion europĂ©enne et la Chine marque une Ă©tape pour lutter contre la concurrence dĂ©loyale, notamment sur les vĂ©hicules hybrides. Nous voulons une concurrence juste, qui protĂšge nos entreprises et nos emplois.
2. AccĂ©lĂ©rer lâĂ©lectrification et la rĂ©industrialisation.
Plus de 40 % des vĂ©hicules vendus en septembre Ă©taient Ă©lectriques. Avec France 2030, nous avons investi dans lâinnovation, relancĂ© des filiĂšres industrielles et dĂ©montrĂ© quâon pouvait crĂ©er des emplois tout en dĂ©carbonant notre Ă©conomie. Nous continuerons, notamment avec le vĂ©hicule autonome.
3. Renforcer notre souveraineté européenne.
Avec nos partenaires allemands, nous avançons vers un accord pour concilier décarbonation, compétitivité et protection de notre industrie. Avec une priorité : produire en Europe nos véhicules et leurs composants.
Nous avons montré que nous pouvions y arriver. Soyons fiers de nos industries et de nos savoir-faire.
Continuons à décarboner sans désindustrialiser, innover sans dépendre et défendre notre capacité à produire en Europe.
Croyons en nous, en notre industrie et en notre avenir !
Impossible nâest pas Français !
Aujourdâhui nous avons 4 gigafactories en France, taines de milliers de vĂ©hicules Ă©lectriques et nos R4 et R5 sortent de nos usines avec des batteries fabriquĂ©es chez nous.
Câest trĂšs concret, câest bon pour nos emplois, notre Ă©conomie, et cohĂ©rent avec nos objectifs climatiques.
Au Mondial de lâAuto ce matin, jâai rĂ©affirmĂ© une ambition claire : notre industrie automobile française et europĂ©enne innove, accĂ©lĂšre et se rĂ©industrialise. Nous devons continuer et aller plus loin.
Trois priorités :
1. Protéger notre industrie.
Lâaccord engagĂ© entre lâUnion europĂ©enne et la Chine marque une Ă©tape pour lutter contre la concurrence dĂ©loyale, notamment sur les vĂ©hicules hybrides. Nous voulons une concurrence juste, qui protĂšge nos entreprises et nos emplois.
2. AccĂ©lĂ©rer lâĂ©lectrification et la rĂ©industrialisation.
Plus de 40 % des vĂ©hicules vendus en septembre Ă©taient Ă©lectriques. Avec France 2030, nous avons investi dans lâinnovation, relancĂ© des filiĂšres industrielles et dĂ©montrĂ© quâon pouvait crĂ©er des emplois tout en dĂ©carbonant notre Ă©conomie. Nous continuerons, notamment avec le vĂ©hicule autonome.
3. Renforcer notre souveraineté européenne.
Avec nos partenaires allemands, nous avançons vers un accord pour concilier décarbonation, compétitivité et protection de notre industrie. Avec une priorité : produire en Europe nos véhicules et leurs composants.
Nous avons montré que nous pouvions y arriver. Soyons fiers de nos industries et de nos savoir-faire.
Continuons à décarboner sans désindustrialiser, innover sans dépendre et défendre notre capacité à produire en Europe.
Croyons en nous, en notre industrie et en notre avenir !
1,758
1,100
6,525
532,497
As an auto-industry veteran and âCar Guyâ, Iâm inevitably drawn to those generation cars that changed the industry; cars which bravely challenged convention and people who took a risk. Cars like Ford Model T (1908, democratising car ownership); Austin Seven (1922, influencing BMW and Datsun); BMC Mini (1959, transverse engine); Lambo Miura (1966, mid-engined supercar); VW Golf Mk1 (1974 defining hatchback); Toyota Prius (1997, scaling electrified powertrains); Nissan Qashqai (2007, crossover); Nissan LEAF (2010, pioneering the modern BEV). There are perhaps other like the Toyota Corolla, the Mercedes S-Class and the RangeRover among others that one could name. There are plenty of attempts that tried and (arguably) failed. The Tucker 48 (1948); Chrysler Turbine (1963); Aston Martin Lagonda (1976); DeLorean DMC-12 (1981); GM EV1 (1996); Renault Avantime (2001); VW Phaeton (2002); BMW IÂŁ (2013); Toyota Mirai (2014); Jaguar I-Pace (2018). While they might not have changed the industry, they added to its learning and its history.
So what? Well Iâve had the honour to be at the centre of some of those generational cars and also cars that have failed to hit the intended target. It takes bravery and vision to cause a change. I remember one industry colleague telling me Iâd have been better off throwing the $4B LEAF development budget into the Pacific!
And so I turn to the conversation; polarised love and hate; around the Jaguar 01. One has to take a personal view on style - Iâve seen the car in the flesh and its imposing; one might question the price positioning; the interior practicality; or its commercial prospects. The decision to stop production of Jaguar for two years and prepare for this launch wouldnât have been my approach, but that doesnât make it wrong. What the Jaguar 01 is, is brave. That is to be commended and I salute my @JLR_News industry colleagues for it. Whether it becomes a generational car or not, only time will tell; but what is sure, is that has added to the automobile history books in trying to find a new answer to a segment by leveraging an EV architecture. For the sake of this storied brand, I hope it succeeds.
So what? Well Iâve had the honour to be at the centre of some of those generational cars and also cars that have failed to hit the intended target. It takes bravery and vision to cause a change. I remember one industry colleague telling me Iâd have been better off throwing the $4B LEAF development budget into the Pacific!
And so I turn to the conversation; polarised love and hate; around the Jaguar 01. One has to take a personal view on style - Iâve seen the car in the flesh and its imposing; one might question the price positioning; the interior practicality; or its commercial prospects. The decision to stop production of Jaguar for two years and prepare for this launch wouldnât have been my approach, but that doesnât make it wrong. What the Jaguar 01 is, is brave. That is to be commended and I salute my @JLR_News industry colleagues for it. Whether it becomes a generational car or not, only time will tell; but what is sure, is that has added to the automobile history books in trying to find a new answer to a segment by leveraging an EV architecture. For the sake of this storied brand, I hope it succeeds.
37
13
175
26,337
From @thetimes today. Industry lobby will inevitably win concessions on the timing of the ZEV mandate; however, in compromising on the speed to transition to BEV there is room to clarify the content of the gap between 2030-2035. It should ban new âself chargingâ hybrids, than an ICE with a battery. The technology for PHEV and REEV is sufficiently advanced to mandate that every car should have a plug and be capable of at least 60 miles of autonomous EV range. Now is the moment to close the loophole in return for slowing the transition to full BEV (but speeding the transition to lower Co2 and clean air) @jreynoldsMP
22
13
78
5,037
I spoke with @LBC earlier today on whether the U.K. should increase tariffs on Chinese cars.
5
3
26
2,469
This is of course all true as youâd expect from the exemplary authority on car sales. But I would add that there is an R2 0.85 correlation to EV consideration when oil is between $90-100/ barrel. The argument for EV becomes economically compelling and you see this in September sales. Expect the diesel market to disappear and good luck trying to sell a 2nd hand one in part-ex for an EV!
Battery electric vehicle (BEV) demand climbed 36.3% to a record high volume of 99,199 units with market share up five percentage points to 28.3%.
That equates to almost five new BEVs registered every minute â more than double the rate three years ago â as buyers respond to ice, especially in the smaller segments, compelling discounts and governmentâs Electric Car Grant.
smmt.co.uk/record-electriâŠ
8
9
55
3,580
Dr. Andy Palmer retweeted
âĄïžTop 10 EV Models - September â26âĄïž
The U.K.âs best selling EVs are đ
The U.K.âs best selling EVs are đ
29
18
207
111,506
Preliminary @SMMT data for U.K. car sales in September
Record electric car market powers bumper September
The New car market grows 12.1% â the 10th consecutive month of growth and strongest September since 2017.
A record 99,199 battery electric cars join the road â almost 5 s respond to the oil crisis and more models to chose from
Year-to-date BEV share reaches 26.2%, showing strong progress and almost certainly ahead of the ZEV mandate after adjusting for flexibilities enabled by the mandate.
@jreynoldsMP
Record electric car market powers bumper September
The New car market grows 12.1% â the 10th consecutive month of growth and strongest September since 2017.
A record 99,199 battery electric cars join the road â almost 5 s respond to the oil crisis and more models to chose from
Year-to-date BEV share reaches 26.2%, showing strong progress and almost certainly ahead of the ZEV mandate after adjusting for flexibilities enabled by the mandate.
@jreynoldsMP
5
8
36
1,479

















