Planning tip for the Halloween series: convert the window to your own time zone today, not on Saturday. The posting slot @TheDAOLabs set on WhoTweets is a single hour, and that is tight if you also want to submit cleanly.
I am setting a reminder thirty minutes before and drafting earlier in the week. Simple logistics. There is enough notice to plan, and #SocialMining rewards the folks who read the schedule twice.
I am setting a reminder thirty minutes before and drafting earlier in the week. Simple logistics. There is enough notice to plan, and #SocialMining rewards the folks who read the schedule twice.
🎃 🦇 🐱⬛ 🕸️ 🍬 ✨
Spooky season has officially taken over WhoTweets! 🦇
We’re launching a special Halloween Terror Task series on WhoTweets.
It’s time to share your real Web3 stories, show off your proof of work, and collect your Rewards before the witching hour strikes.
on! Post and submit on Sat 31st, 12:00–13:00 UTC. Just an hour to do it… Or else…
Review the guidelines in the thread and don't get spooked by the competition.
👇👇👇
39
12
40
1,185
A small detail from September stayed with me. Bloomberg's James Seyffart counted roughly 30 institutional holders of HYPE, together holding about 1.15 million tokens.
Price is not my interest here. What caught my attention is why institutions would look at the token at all. Hyperliquid generates fees, a share of them supports buybacks, and HYPE was added to the Hashdex Nasdaq CME Crypto Index US ETF at about 3.4%. The story is cash flow you can check on-chain.
That lesson carries straight into how miners should write about any protocol. Show where value comes from, cite the source, skip the hype. It's the habit @TheDAOLabs keeps rewarding through #SocialMining research tasks, and it explains why the Elysium campaign writers spent so much time on sequencer revenue.
Careful analysis travels further in #DAOVERSE than excitement does, and institutions seem to agree.
Price is not my interest here. What caught my attention is why institutions would look at the token at all. Hyperliquid generates fees, a share of them supports buybacks, and HYPE was added to the Hashdex Nasdaq CME Crypto Index US ETF at about 3.4%. The story is cash flow you can check on-chain.
That lesson carries straight into how miners should write about any protocol. Show where value comes from, cite the source, skip the hype. It's the habit @TheDAOLabs keeps rewarding through #SocialMining research tasks, and it explains why the Elysium campaign writers spent so much time on sequencer revenue.
Careful analysis travels further in #DAOVERSE than excitement does, and institutions seem to agree.
19
11
30
2,179
The compute series has already covered what a GPU hour is and who makes, owns, rents and trades it. Its next part, according to @TheDAOLabs, is teased as spot price swings, inference overtaking training, and on-chain liquidity for processing power.
That third topic is the one I'd prepare for. Training happens in big bursts at a few labs. Inference happens every time someone sends a prompt, everywhere, all day. If inference becomes the bigger slice of demand, compute starts behaving less like a project budget and more like a utility with a live market price.
For #SocialMining that means a year of tasks about DePIN marketplaces, pricing and capacity claims. Miners who already know the four tiers will write the explainers everyone else in #DAOVERSE ends up sharing.
Worth starting the reading now, before the rush.
That third topic is the one I'd prepare for. Training happens in big bursts at a few labs. Inference happens every time someone sends a prompt, everywhere, all day. If inference becomes the bigger slice of demand, compute starts behaving less like a project budget and more like a utility with a live market price.
For #SocialMining that means a year of tasks about DePIN marketplaces, pricing and capacity claims. Miners who already know the four tiers will write the explainers everyone else in #DAOVERSE ends up sharing.
Worth starting the reading now, before the rush.
23
16
34
1,947
Every marketing report I've seen from an agency has the same weakness: the agency wrote it.
The On X card that project admins get for featured posts takes a different route. The figures come from X itself, alongside an engagement breakdown, a chart of registered miners who took part and CSV exports anyone on the team can open. Engagement is matched to each account's numeric ID, so every row maps to an actual account.
That matters when a budget holder asks whether the campaign worked. With @TheDAOLabs, the answer is a file pulled from the platform where the engagement happened, not a slide deck. For #DAOVERSE teams that need to justify spend, #SocialMining backed by numbers like these makes for a much easier conversation.
The On X card that project admins get for featured posts takes a different route. The figures come from X itself, alongside an engagement breakdown, a chart of registered miners who took part and CSV exports anyone on the team can open. Engagement is matched to each account's numeric ID, so every row maps to an actual account.
That matters when a budget holder asks whether the campaign worked. With @TheDAOLabs, the answer is a file pulled from the platform where the engagement happened, not a slide deck. For #DAOVERSE teams that need to justify spend, #SocialMining backed by numbers like these makes for a much easier conversation.
45
10
48
1,531
Good partnerships are boring in the best way.
The project gets reach and useful feedback. Writers get paid fairly for work that was checked first. Nobody fakes engagement, nobody chases unpaid invoices, nobody wonders where the budget went.
That alignment is weirdly rare in crypto marketing, outside the #DAOVERSE at least.
And it's exactly why teams keep coming back to @TheDAOLabs for #SocialMining campaigns, season after season.
The project gets reach and useful feedback. Writers get paid fairly for work that was checked first. Nobody fakes engagement, nobody chases unpaid invoices, nobody wonders where the budget went.
That alignment is weirdly rare in crypto marketing, outside the #DAOVERSE at least.
And it's exactly why teams keep coming back to @TheDAOLabs for #SocialMining campaigns, season after season.
44
11
53
2,109
Godwin, Oluwaseun, cuemnee on the podium. different styles, same result
that's what makes #SocialMining at @TheDAOLabs interesting to me. no single formula, just people finding what works and sticking with it
that's what makes #SocialMining at @TheDAOLabs interesting to me. no single formula, just people finding what works and sticking with it
🚀 WhoTweets Workdrop #2639 is SENT! ✔️
Another round of rewards out the door—huge shoutout to everyone putting in the work! 💸✨
📊 WORKDROP SUMMARY:
• Total Rewards: $942.42
• Total Claimers: 35
🏆 TOP 5 PERFORMERS:
🥇 @GodwinEze6 — $101.23
🥈 @Oluwaseun52623A — $42.00
🥉 TianahZiva — $28.00
5️⃣ @sheishelen914 — $25.00
Check your wallets, keep the momentum going, and let's keep building! 💪
34
11
35
1,904
Sanny 🤍 retweeted
Tried to pin down one number this morning. The going rate for a single enterprise GPU-hour.
Opened five rental listings. Got five prices. Not close either.
That's the gap this first Compute as an Asset piece from @TheDAOLabs leaves open, and I don't mean that as a knock. The article checks every commodity box. Tradable. Scarce. Moves with supply and demand. Has a resale market.
What it doesn't have yet is a reference price everyone quotes.
Oil traders argue about plenty. They don't argue about where to look up the price. A shared benchmark is boring plumbing. It's also what lets a buyer and a seller skip the haggling, and what lets a third person write a contract on top of the trade.
Until GPU-hours get that, it's a market the way a night market is a market. Real trades. Every stall with its own price.
The same thing is quietly true for #SocialMining. Points exist. A public reference for what one unit of contribution is worth doesn't.
Benchmark first. Then it's a commodity.
Opened five rental listings. Got five prices. Not close either.
That's the gap this first Compute as an Asset piece from @TheDAOLabs leaves open, and I don't mean that as a knock. The article checks every commodity box. Tradable. Scarce. Moves with supply and demand. Has a resale market.
What it doesn't have yet is a reference price everyone quotes.
Oil traders argue about plenty. They don't argue about where to look up the price. A shared benchmark is boring plumbing. It's also what lets a buyer and a seller skip the haggling, and what lets a third person write a contract on top of the trade.
Until GPU-hours get that, it's a market the way a night market is a market. Real trades. Every stall with its own price.
The same thing is quietly true for #SocialMining. Points exist. A public reference for what one unit of contribution is worth doesn't.
Benchmark first. Then it's a commodity.
Machine + electricity = market-priced output.
The logic behind Bitcoin and Social Mining is now turning raw processing power into AI’s new oil.
Here is what “compute” actually means, how GPU-hours trade, and why it matters.
👇👀🖋👇
49
12
55
1,072
Tried to pin down one number this morning. The going rate for a single enterprise GPU-hour.
Opened five rental listings. Got five prices. Not close either.
That's the gap this first Compute as an Asset piece from @TheDAOLabs leaves open, and I don't mean that as a knock. The article checks every commodity box. Tradable. Scarce. Moves with supply and demand. Has a resale market.
What it doesn't have yet is a reference price everyone quotes.
Oil traders argue about plenty. They don't argue about where to look up the price. A shared benchmark is boring plumbing. It's also what lets a buyer and a seller skip the haggling, and what lets a third person write a contract on top of the trade.
Until GPU-hours get that, it's a market the way a night market is a market. Real trades. Every stall with its own price.
The same thing is quietly true for #SocialMining. Points exist. A public reference for what one unit of contribution is worth doesn't.
Benchmark first. Then it's a commodity.
Opened five rental listings. Got five prices. Not close either.
That's the gap this first Compute as an Asset piece from @TheDAOLabs leaves open, and I don't mean that as a knock. The article checks every commodity box. Tradable. Scarce. Moves with supply and demand. Has a resale market.
What it doesn't have yet is a reference price everyone quotes.
Oil traders argue about plenty. They don't argue about where to look up the price. A shared benchmark is boring plumbing. It's also what lets a buyer and a seller skip the haggling, and what lets a third person write a contract on top of the trade.
Until GPU-hours get that, it's a market the way a night market is a market. Real trades. Every stall with its own price.
The same thing is quietly true for #SocialMining. Points exist. A public reference for what one unit of contribution is worth doesn't.
Benchmark first. Then it's a commodity.
Machine + electricity = market-priced output.
The logic behind Bitcoin and Social Mining is now turning raw processing power into AI’s new oil.
Here is what “compute” actually means, how GPU-hours trade, and why it matters.
👇👀🖋👇
49
12
55
1,072
Split contributors into two piles last weekend. Before their first reward. After it.
Same people. Same task. Different writers.
Before the payout, posts ran longer. Weirder. Full of half-formed opinions and the odd typo. After, they got tighter. Cleaner. And honestly, a lot more alike.
Not saying money ruins people. It's subtler than that. Once you see what got paid, you start writing toward it.
That's the part I keep turning over with #SocialMining at @TheDAOLabs. The reward is supposed to measure the signal. Then the signal quietly reshapes itself around the reward.
The contributors I'd actually bet on are the few whose writing barely moved. Same voice in week one and week twelve. Still chasing odd angles nobody scored them for.
Small sample. Could be coincidence.
But next time you scroll a leaderboard, go check what the top names sounded like before they ever got paid.
Same people. Same task. Different writers.
Before the payout, posts ran longer. Weirder. Full of half-formed opinions and the odd typo. After, they got tighter. Cleaner. And honestly, a lot more alike.
Not saying money ruins people. It's subtler than that. Once you see what got paid, you start writing toward it.
That's the part I keep turning over with #SocialMining at @TheDAOLabs. The reward is supposed to measure the signal. Then the signal quietly reshapes itself around the reward.
The contributors I'd actually bet on are the few whose writing barely moved. Same voice in week one and week twelve. Still chasing odd angles nobody scored them for.
Small sample. Could be coincidence.
But next time you scroll a leaderboard, go check what the top names sounded like before they ever got paid.
40
16
37
1,878