Pinned Tweet
Cork has raised $5.5M to build the missing tokenized risk infrastructure for digital assets.

Led by @RoadCapMgmt and @a16zcrypto CSX, Cork has raised from investors who recognize the market opportunity of introducing tokenized risk into the digital asset ecosystem.
169
247
1,377
179,022
When stress hits, everyone wants their money at once. A liquidity buffer is what lets a vault pay them. Here’s how traditional finance builds them, how DeFi has, and a live example of an external buffer in use 🧵
2
0
4
372
Replying to @Corkprotocol
When withdrawals spike, those tokens guarantee instant redemptions, however much collateral is deployed and whatever Morpho utilization or market depth looks like. The vault’s capital stays deployed, and LPs earn native yield plus a risk premium for providing the guarantee.
1
0
1
38
Replying to @Corkprotocol
The bigger picure: the yield layer and the liquidity layer can be separated and priced independently. It applies anywhere duration mismatch creates friction between deployed capital and redemption demand.
0
0
1
36
Idea: risk markets where the agents themselves can be underwritten.
1
0
3
359
DeFi scaled on liquid collateral, so most of it assumes an asset can be turned into cash quickly. RWAs, fixed-rate lending, cross-chain settlement and complex vaults break that assumption.

That’s liquidity risk: capital that can’t become cash without loss or delay 🧵
3
0
5
397
Replying to @Corkprotocol
Take ACRED, a tokenized Apollo credit fund. It inherits quarterly repurchase offers of at least 5% of shares, paid pro rata if requests exceed that, so exiting can take several quarters. The price is set at NAV on the pricing date, so redeemers carry NAV risk while they wait.
1
0
1
41
Replying to @Corkprotocol
Cork’s tokenized risk layer prices and trades illiquidity itself. Separate the liquidity risk from the underlying asset, and a vault can hold long-duration RWAs while underwriters carry the wait.

That’s a path to scalable, composable yield vaults.
0
0
1
55
The number one skill @robdogeth thinks AI won’t replace: agency.

Humans stay in the loop to decide what gets built and how. Specialization matters less, and developers increasingly look like product managers.
0
4
8
474
An agent can swap on Uniswap, lend and borrow on Morpho, and pay over x402. What it doesn’t have is a general function to call to transfer tail risk or buy protection against a strategy failing. Swapping, lending and paying all have interfaces. Risk management doesn’t yet.
1
0
8
569
Replying to @Corkprotocol
So what would that function look like? As a spec, for pegged assets: someone deposits collateral and gets two tokens. One lets its holder swap the pegged asset for that collateral at a known rate before expiry. The other takes the underwriting side in exchange for yield.
1
0
2
85
Replying to @Corkprotocol
That’s Cork’s programmable risk primitive. The first token is the Cork Swap Token (cST), the second is the Cork Principal Token (cPT), and pool operations are callable contract functions, so an agent can use them directly.
0
0
2
67
“The history of this AI evolution in the last year is a good indication of probably what comes next and how we should adapt to it.”

@robdogeth's ETH AI and Engineering Group full presentation can be found on the link below ⬇️
1
0
9
481