Pinned Tweet
🎉 Launching online today:
"Calculating Empires: A Genealogy of Technology and Power since 1500."

Dive into our large-scale interactive visualization exploring how technical and social structures co-evolved over five centuries. 🧵 calculatingempires.net
71
537
1,474
160,513
Kate Crawford retweeted
Este febrero sacamos en @babelia una portada con Calculating empires, la magnífica obra expansiva de @katecrawford y @TheCreaturesLab sobre tecnología y poder
elpais.com/babelia/2025-0…

Hoy esa obra abre la expo de la temporada en el @MuseumModernArt moma.org/calendar/exhib…
1
32
93
4,437
Kate Crawford retweeted
I've long regarded @katecrawford as one of the most lucid and urgent voices in the realm of AI, so it was incredibly meaningful to hear this shoutout during her excellent conversation at @ArtBasel. To be seen by someone like Kate as a "rare" example of an artist approaching AI ye, asking questions, pushing boundaries in a sea of AI "spectacularism and distraction" and "cool images" - it truly means a lot.
13
12
104
7,827
Kate Crawford retweeted
Panelists Demis Hassabis, Kate Crawford and Glenn Fogel explored the practical and ethical dimensions of AI’s real-world rollout time.com/collections/ti…
6
9
35
33,599
Kate Crawford retweeted
27
155
871
110,186
The AI Summit ends in rupture. AI accelerationists want pure expansion—more capital, energy, private infrastructure, no guard rails. Public interest camp supports labor, sustainability, shared data. safety, and oversight. The gap never looked wider. AI is in its empire era.
36
272
865
68,613
Replying to @katecrawford
So it goes deeper than just the US and UK not signing the agreement. There are deep ideological divides, and multiple fractures.
4
14
103
9,728
The AI Summit opens with @AnneBouverot centering three issues for AI: sustainability, jobs, and public infrastructure. Glad to see these core problems raised from the start. #AIsummit
6
16
70
8,277
Calculating Empires is on the cover of EL PAIS today! Interview with Vladan & I about our two exhibitions in Spain, and the connections of politics, history, theory, and technology in our work and personal lives 📰 @el_pais @minipetite @TheCreaturesLab elpais.com/babelia/2025-0…
7
32
123
10,317
Kate Crawford retweeted
Estoy muy contenta. Ha salido la portada de @babelia_elpais sobre Calculando Imperios, el trabajo de @katecrawford y @TheCreaturesLab sobre Tecnología y poder. Gracias @jordiamat22

elpais.com/babelia/2025-0…
8
45
166
22,376
DeepSeek forces a rethink of the compute & energy costs of AI models. In a new paper with @SashaMTL @strubell, we look at the full environmental impacts of AI – both direct and indirect – and what 𝐉e𝐯𝐨𝐧𝐬 𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐚𝐝𝐨𝐱 means for AI and climate. A thread: 🧵
7
75
178
19,749
Replying to @katecrawford
Conclusion: AI advances can't reduce climate impacts if they fuel exponential consumption
📌 Energy efficiency alone isn't enough
📌 Integrate total lifecycle assessments + socioeconomic analysis for climate interventions
📌 Address AI-driven economic & behavioral shifts
2
8
32
4,082
Replying to @katecrawford
🌎Full paper here:
"From Efficiency Gains to Rebound Effects: The Problem of Jevons’ Paradox in AI’s Polarized Environmental Debate"
arxiv.org/pdf/2501.16548
2
9
26
3,939
My piece in @WIRED on 2025: the year of AI agents. The coming psychopolitical regime "directs the environments where our ideas are born, developed, and expressed.

We will be playing an imitation game that ultimately plays us."
wired.com/story/ai-agent…
9
101
267
19,029
Kate Crawford retweeted
"Calculating Empires" is the most amazing visualisation I've ever seen, a work of art at every level, spent minutes scrolling and there appears to be no end. calculatingempires.net
3
107
224
31,376
Kate Crawford retweeted
AI unplugged! @katecrawford in conversation with @TobyWalsh

Join us for a fascinating discussion on the impact of artificial intelligence.

#AI @unsw_ai
@csesoc
@UNSWCOMPUTING
@UNSWEngineering

eventbrite.com.au/e/ai-unplugged…
2
6
22
7,511
Kate Crawford retweeted
Does more compute equate with greater risk?

What is our track record at predicting what risks emerge with scale?

I don't have much time anymore to write, but this felt important enough to write down some thoughts on.

arxiv.org/pdf/2407.05694…
9
77
322
144,335